Master the accounting, valuation, M&A, and LBO concepts you need to ace investment banking technical interviews.
Technical questions test whether you can do the actual job. Every concept here could appear in your interview — from the classic “$10 depreciation” walkthrough to complex LBO scenarios.
The three financial statements, how they link, and the classic interview walkthroughs.
| Statement | What It Shows | Key Line Items |
|---|---|---|
| Income Statement | Profitability over a period | Revenue, COGS, Gross Profit, EBITDA, EBIT, Net Income |
| Balance Sheet | Financial position at a point in time | Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity |
| Cash Flow Statement | Cash movements over a period | Cash from Operations, Investing, Financing |
Income Statement: Pre-Tax Income falls by $10. Tax expense falls by $2.50 (= $10 × 25%). Net Income falls by $7.50.
Cash Flow Statement: Net Income is down $7.50, but Depreciation (non-cash) is added back: +$10. Net effect: Cash is UP by $2.50.
Balance Sheet: Assets: Cash up $2.50, PP&E down $10 → Total Assets down $7.50. L&E: Equity down $7.50 (via Retained Earnings). Both sides down $7.50 → Balances.
Intuition: Depreciation is a non-cash charge that creates a real tax shield worth $2.50.
IS: OpEx up $10K → Pre-Tax Income down $10K → Tax savings $2.5K → Net Income down $7.5K
CFS: Net Income down $7.5K, but AP increases by $10K (non-cash WC source) → Cash UP by $2.5K
BS: Cash up $2.5K (Assets up $2.5K). AP up $10K, Equity down $7.5K (L&E up $2.5K). Balances.
IS: No changes (expense already recorded). CFS: AP decreases by $10K → Cash DOWN $10K.
BS: Cash down $10K. AP down $10K. Both sides down $10K. Balances.
| Concept | Key Point |
|---|---|
| Goodwill | Created in acquisitions when purchase price > FMV of net assets. Not amortised under US GAAP (tested annually for impairment). |
| Operating Leases (ASC 842) | Now on Balance Sheet as Right-of-Use Assets and Lease Liabilities. Previously off-BS. |
| Revenue Recognition (ASC 606) | Recognise when performance obligation is satisfied, not necessarily when cash is received. |
| Stock-Based Compensation | Non-cash expense on IS, added back on CFS. Creates dilution (more shares). |
| Deferred Tax Assets/Liabilities | DTA: company paid MORE tax than IS shows. DTL: paid LESS than IS shows. |
The bridge formula, pairing rules, and Treasury Stock Method.
Enterprise Value multiples pair with metrics available to ALL capital providers (before interest).
Equity Value multiples pair with metrics available ONLY to equity holders (after interest).
Enterprise Value = Equity Value + Total Debt − Cash + Preferred Stock + Minority Interest + Capital Leases + Unfunded Pensions
Why subtract Cash? Cash is a non-operating asset. An acquirer “gets” the cash, reducing the net cost of the business.
Why add Minority Interest? The company consolidates 100% of the subsidiary’s revenue/EBITDA, so EV must reflect the full claim.
| Multiple | Numerator | Denominator | Why This Pairing |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Revenue | Enterprise Value | Revenue | Revenue is available to all capital providers |
| EV / EBITDA | Enterprise Value | EBITDA | EBITDA is before interest expense |
| EV / EBIT | Enterprise Value | EBIT | EBIT is before interest expense |
| P / E | Equity Value (per share) | Net Income (EPS) | Net Income is after interest (equity only) |
| P / BV | Equity Value (per share) | Book Value of Equity | Book equity belongs to shareholders |
Accounts for the dilutive effect of stock options and warrants:
Comps, precedent transactions, DCF, and when each applies.
Value a company by looking at how similar public companies are currently valued.
+ Market-based, uses current data, relatively simple. − No two companies are identical, affected by market sentiment.
Value by looking at what acquirers actually paid for similar companies in past M&A deals.
+ Reflects actual prices including control premium (20–40%). − Past conditions may differ, fewer data points.
Value based on the present value of future free cash flows. (Detailed in Section 04.)
+ Intrinsic value, independent of market. − Highly sensitive to assumptions.
| Methodology | Tends to Produce | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Public Comps | Baseline / middle | Current market pricing, no control premium |
| Precedent Transactions | Higher than Comps | Includes control premium (20–40%) |
| DCF | Most variable | Highly dependent on assumptions |
| Liquidation | Lowest (99% of cases) | Just asset values |
| LBO Analysis | Often lower | PE needs returns, so they pay less |
| Industry | Key Multiples | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Most Industries | EV/EBITDA, P/E | Standard set |
| Banks / Insurance | P/E, P/BV | Debt is “inventory”, not financing |
| REITs | P/FFO, P/AFFO | RE depreciation differs from economic |
| Oil & Gas | EV/EBITDAX, EV/Reserves | X = exploration added back |
| Tech / SaaS | EV/Revenue, EV/ARR | Pre-profit companies valued on revenue |
| Retail / Airlines | EV/EBITDAR | R = rent added back (own vs lease) |
The two-stage unlevered DCF, WACC, terminal value, and sensitivity analysis.
Stage 1: Project Unlevered Free Cash Flows year by year (typically 5–10 years). Discount each at WACC.
Stage 2: Estimate Terminal Value — the value of ALL cash flows beyond the forecast period. Discount back to today.
Result: Sum of PV(Stage 1) + PV(Terminal Value) = Enterprise Value
EBIT (Operating Income) × (1 − Tax Rate) ← “Unlevered taxes” = NOPAT + Depreciation & Amortisation ± Changes in Working Capital − Capital Expenditures = Unlevered Free Cash Flow (UFCF)
Why EBIT × (1−t) instead of actual taxes? To avoid double-counting the interest tax shield, which is already captured in the cost of debt component of WACC.
WACC = Cost of Debt × (1 − Tax Rate) × (Debt / Total Capital)
+ Cost of Equity × (Equity / Total Capital) Cost of Equity = Risk-Free Rate + Beta × Equity Risk Premium
| Input | Source / Typical Value |
|---|---|
| Risk-Free Rate | 10-year or 20-year government bond yield |
| Beta | Levered beta from comparable companies (or unlevered and re-levered) |
| Equity Risk Premium | Historical ~4–7% (Damodaran estimates widely used) |
| Cost of Debt | YTM on existing debt, or new debt rate |
| Tax Rate | Marginal corporate tax rate (not effective) |
| Capital Weights | Market values of debt and equity |
TV = FCF(final year) × (1 + g) / (WACC − g)
g (perpetual growth) should be ≤ long-term GDP (~2–3%). Cannot exceed WACC.
TV = Terminal Year EBITDA × Exit Multiple
Exit multiple from current trading multiples. More market-based but circular.
Enterprise Value − Net Debt − Preferred Stock − Minority Interest + Non-operating Assets = Equity Value ÷ Diluted Shares Outstanding = Equity Value per Share
| Common Pair | What It Tests |
|---|---|
| WACC vs. Terminal Growth Rate | How discount rate and long-term growth assumptions affect value |
| WACC vs. Exit Multiple | How discount rate and market-based TV affect value |
| Revenue Growth vs. EBITDA Margin | How operating performance assumptions affect value |
Processes, synergies, deal consideration, and accretion/dilution.
| Type | Examples | Ease |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Synergies | Eliminate duplicate functions (HR, IT, finance), supply chain efficiencies, facility consolidation | Easier — more quantifiable |
| Revenue Synergies | Cross-selling, new markets, pricing power, combined products | Harder — markets are sceptical |
| Payment | % of M&A | Implications |
|---|---|---|
| Cash | ~57% | Clean, certain value. Depletes buyer cash or increases debt. |
| Cash & Stock | ~28% | Shared risk/reward between buyer and seller. |
| Stock | ~10% | No cash outflow. Seller participates in upside. Dilutes existing shareholders. |
Seller’s Purchase Yield = Seller’s Net Income / Purchase Price
After-Tax Cost of Stock = 1 / Acquirer’s P/E
After-Tax Cost of Debt = Interest Rate × (1 − Tax Rate)
After-Tax Cost of Cash = Cash Interest Rate × (1 − Tax Rate)
If Weighted Cost of Acquisition > Seller’s Purchase Yield → Dilutive
The house analogy, return drivers, capital structure, and quick math.
Buy a €500K house: €100K down payment (equity) + €400K mortgage (debt).
Sell 5 years later for €650K. Remaining mortgage: €250K.
Your equity: €650K − €250K = €400K. MOIC: 4.0x. IRR: ~32%.
The house value grew 30%, but your equity grew 300% thanks to leverage.
Revenue growth + margin expansion → higher exit enterprise value.
Selling at a higher EV/EBITDA than entry (e.g., buy at 8x, sell at 10x).
Company’s cash flows repay debt → equity value grows even if EV stays flat.
| Characteristic | Why It Matters |
|---|---|
| Stable, predictable cash flows | Must reliably service debt payments |
| Low CapEx requirements | More cash available for debt paydown |
| Strong market position | Defensible business with pricing power |
| Operational improvement opps | PE can drive EBITDA growth through efficiency |
| Clear exit path | IPO, strategic sale, or secondary sale viable |
| Asset-heavy | Provides collateral for debt financing |
| Layer | Type | Key Features |
|---|---|---|
| 1 (Senior) | Revolving Credit | Draw and repay as needed; secured; SOFR + spread |
| 2 (Senior) | Term Loan A | Amortising; held by banks; ~5yr term |
| 3 (Senior) | Term Loan B/C | Minimal amortisation; institutional investors; ~7yr |
| 4 (Senior) | 2nd Lien | Junior to 1st lien; no amortisation; higher spread |
| 5 | High Yield Bonds | Fixed coupon, 7–10yr, bullet; below investment grade |
| 6 | Mezzanine | Between debt and equity; may include warrants; 12–20% |
| 7 | Sponsor Equity | PE equity + management rollover; 30–50% of total |
Buy company for €500M at 5x EBITDA (€100M). Fund with 60% debt (€300M) + 40% equity (€200M).
After 5 years: EBITDA grows to €130M. Exit at 6x. Paid down €100M debt.
Exit EV: €130M × 6 = €780M
Remaining Debt: €300M − €100M = €200M
Exit Equity: €780M − €200M = €580M
MOIC: €580M / €200M = 2.9x. IRR: ~24%.
The 3-statement model, working capital, and Wall Street conventions.
The 3-Statement Financial Model (FSM) is the foundation that feeds into ALL other models:
If your FSM is wrong, everything built on it is wrong.
| Item | Driver | Key Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Accounts Receivable | Revenue | DSO = A/R / Revenue × 365 |
| Inventory | COGS | DIO = Inventory / COGS × 365 |
| Accounts Payable | COGS | DPO = A/P / COGS × 365 |
Cash Conversion Cycle = DSO + DIO − DPO
CFO: Net Income + Non-cash (D&A, SBC) ± Working Capital changes
CFI: CapEx (negative), Acquisitions (negative), Asset sales (positive)
CFF: Debt issuance/repayment, Equity issuance/buybacks, Dividends
Ending Cash = Beginning Cash + CFO + CFI + CFF → Must equal Cash on Balance Sheet.
| Convention | Why |
|---|---|
| Blue = inputs, Black = formulas | Easy to identify assumptions vs calculations |
| Never re-enter inputs | Enter once, reference everywhere |
| No hidden rows | Use grouping (Alt+Shift+Arrow) instead |
| Don’t embed numbers in formulas | All assumptions should be visible and changeable |
| Light “disposable” models | Transparent, easy to audit; preferred on Wall Street |
30-second answer frameworks and formula cheat sheet.
Project UFCF for 5–10 years → Calculate terminal value (Gordon Growth or Exit Multiple) → Discount everything at WACC → Sum = Enterprise Value → Subtract net debt → Equity Value → Divide by diluted shares = per-share value.
PE firm acquires company using mostly debt + some equity → Company’s cash flows pay down debt over 3–5 years → Sell at exit multiple → Returns driven by EBITDA growth + multiple expansion + debt paydown.
Combine acquirer + target financials → Adjust for financing costs (interest on new debt, new shares issued) → Add synergies → Subtract incremental D&A from asset write-ups → Calculate pro forma EPS → Compare to standalone EPS = accretive or dilutive.
Three methods: (1) Comparable companies — current market multiples, (2) Precedent transactions — prices paid in M&A, (3) DCF — PV of future cash flows. Each gives a range; the overlap provides a defensible valuation.
Stable cash flows, low CapEx, strong market position, low current leverage, clear exit path, opportunities for operational improvement.
UFCF = EBIT(1−t) + D&A − CapEx ± ΔWC WACC = Kd(1−t)(D/V) + Ke(E/V) Cost of Equity (CAPM) = Rf + β(Rm − Rf) Terminal Value (Gordon) = FCF(1+g) / (WACC − g) Terminal Value (Exit) = EBITDA × Exit Multiple Enterprise Value = Equity Value + Debt − Cash + Preferred + MI MOIC = Exit Equity / Entry Equity CCC = DSO + DIO − DPO
| Category | Must-Know Questions |
|---|---|
| Accounting | $10 depreciation walkthrough; How statements link; Goodwill; Operating leases; Revenue recognition |
| EV / Equity | Bridge formula; Why subtract cash; Why add MI; Pairing rules; Treasury Stock Method |
| Valuation | 3 methodologies; When each highest/lowest; What drives higher multiples; Industry multiples |
| DCF | Full walkthrough; UFCF formula; WACC & CAPM; Terminal value; Why TV is 60–80%; When DCF doesn’t work |
| M&A | Sell-side & buy-side processes; Accretion/dilution; Synergies; Stock vs cash payment |
| LBO | 3 return drivers; Good candidate traits; Sources & Uses; Max purchase price; IRR vs MOIC |
Domina los conceptos de contabilidad, valoración, M&A y LBO que necesitas para aprobar entrevistas técnicas de banca de inversión.
Las preguntas técnicas evalúan si puedes hacer el trabajo real. Cada concepto aquí podría aparecer en tu entrevista — desde el clásico “walkthrough de $10 de depreciación” hasta escenarios complejos de LBO.
Los tres estados financieros, cómo se conectan y los walkthroughs clásicos.
| Estado | Qué Muestra | Líneas Clave |
|---|---|---|
| Cuenta de Resultados | Rentabilidad durante un periodo | Ingresos, COGS, Beneficio Bruto, EBITDA, EBIT, Beneficio Neto |
| Balance | Posición financiera en un momento | Activos = Pasivos + Patrimonio Neto |
| Estado de Flujos de Caja | Movimientos de caja en un periodo | Caja de Operaciones, Inversión, Financiación |
CdR: BAI baja $10. Impuestos bajan $2.50 (= $10 × 25%). BN baja $7.50.
EFC: BN baja $7.50, pero Depreciación (no-cash) se suma: +$10. Efecto neto: Caja SUBE $2.50.
Balance: Activos: Caja +$2.50, PP&E −$10 → Activos Totales −$7.50. Patrimonio −$7.50 (vía Reservas). Cuadra.
Intuición: La depreciación crea un escudo fiscal real de $2.50.
| Concepto | Punto Clave |
|---|---|
| Fondo de Comercio | Se crea en adquisiciones cuando el precio > VRM de activos netos. No se amortiza (US GAAP). |
| Arrendamientos (NIIF 16) | Ahora en Balance como Activos por Derecho de Uso y Pasivos por Arrendamiento. |
| Reconocimiento de Ingresos | Se reconoce cuando se cumple la obligación, no necesariamente cuando se cobra. |
| Compensación en Acciones | Gasto no-cash en CdR, se suma en EFC. Crea dilución. |
| Impuestos Diferidos | Activo (DTA): pagó más de lo que muestra CdR. Pasivo (DTL): pagó menos. |
La fórmula puente, reglas de emparejamiento y Método de Acciones en Tesorería.
Múltiplos de Enterprise Value se emparejan con métricas disponibles para TODOS los proveedores de capital (antes de intereses).
Múltiplos de Equity Value se emparejan con métricas disponibles SOLO para accionistas (después de intereses).
Enterprise Value = Equity Value + Deuda Total − Caja + Acciones Preferentes + Interés Minoritario + Leases + Pensiones no Fondeadas
¿Por qué restar Caja? Es un activo no operativo. El comprador “obtiene” la caja, reduciendo el coste neto.
¿Por qué sumar Interés Minoritario? La empresa consolida 100% de ingresos/EBITDA de la filial.
| Múltiplo | Numerador | Denominador | Razón |
|---|---|---|---|
| EV / Ingresos | Enterprise Value | Ingresos | Disponible para todos |
| EV / EBITDA | Enterprise Value | EBITDA | Antes de intereses |
| P / E | Equity Value | BN (BPA) | Después de intereses |
| P / VL | Equity Value | Valor en Libros | Pertenece a accionistas |
Comparables, transacciones precedentes, DCF y cuándo usar cada una.
Valorar mirando cómo el mercado valora empresas similares cotizadas.
+ Basada en mercado, datos actuales. − No hay dos empresas iguales.
Valorar mirando lo que compradores pagaron en deals similares.
+ Refleja precios reales con prima de control (20–40%). − Condiciones pasadas pueden diferir.
Valorar basado en el valor presente de flujos de caja futuros.
+ Valor intrínseco. − Muy sensible a supuestos.
| Industria | Múltiplos Clave | Notas |
|---|---|---|
| General | EV/EBITDA, P/E | Estándar |
| Bancos | P/E, P/VL | Deuda es “inventario” |
| REITs | P/FFO, P/AFFO | Depreciación inmobiliaria diferente |
| Tech / SaaS | EV/Revenue, EV/ARR | Empresas sin beneficio |
Modelo de dos etapas, WACC, valor terminal y análisis de sensibilidad.
EBIT (Resultado Operativo) × (1 − Tipo Impositivo) = NOPAT + Depreciación & Amortización ± Cambios en Capital Circulante − CapEx = Flujo de Caja Libre no Apalancado (UFCF)
WACC = Kd(1−t)(D/V) + Ke(E/V) Ke (CAPM) = Rf + β(Rm − Rf)
TV = FCF(1+g) / (WACC − g)
g ≤ crecimiento PIB (~2–3%)
TV = EBITDA año terminal × Múltiplo de salida
Basado en múltiplos actuales de mercado.
Enterprise Value − Deuda Neta − Preferentes − Interés Minoritario = Equity Value ÷ Acciones Diluidas = Valor por Acción
Procesos, sinergias, formas de pago y acreción/dilución.
| Tipo | Ejemplos | Facilidad |
|---|---|---|
| Costes | Eliminar duplicados (RRHH, IT), eficiencias cadena suministro | Más fácil |
| Ingresos | Venta cruzada, nuevos mercados, poder de fijación de precios | Más difícil |
Rendimiento de Compra del Vendedor = BN Vendedor / Precio de Compra
Coste de Acciones = 1 / P/E del Comprador
Coste de Deuda = Tipo × (1 − t)
Si Coste Ponderado > Rendimiento del Vendedor → Dilutivo
La analogía de la casa, drivers de retorno y estructura de capital.
Comprar casa de €500K: €100K entrada (equity) + €400K hipoteca (deuda).
Vender 5 años después por €650K. Hipoteca restante: €250K.
Tu equity: €400K. MOIC: 4.0x. IRR: ~32%.
Crecimiento de ingresos + expansión de márgenes.
Vender a mayor múltiplo que la entrada.
Los flujos de caja pagan deuda → equity crece.
| Característica | Razón |
|---|---|
| Flujos de caja estables | Debe poder pagar la deuda |
| Bajo CapEx | Más caja para amortizar deuda |
| Posición de mercado fuerte | Negocio defendible |
| Mejoras operativas posibles | PE puede impulsar EBITDA |
| Salida clara | IPO, venta estratégica o secundaria |
Comprar empresa por €500M a 5x EBITDA (€100M). 60% deuda + 40% equity.
5 años después: EBITDA €130M. Salida a 6x. Pagado €100M deuda.
EV Salida: €780M. Deuda restante: €200M. Equity: €580M.
MOIC: 2.9x. IRR: ~24%.
El modelo de 3 estados, capital circulante y convenciones de Wall Street.
El Modelo de 3 Estados Financieros (FSM) es la base de todos los demás modelos: DCF, LBO, Comps, M&A.
Si tu FSM está mal, todo lo construido sobre él está mal.
| Partida | Driver | Ratio |
|---|---|---|
| Cuentas a Cobrar | Ingresos | DSO = CC / Ingresos × 365 |
| Inventario | COGS | DIO = Inventario / COGS × 365 |
| Cuentas a Pagar | COGS | DPO = CP / COGS × 365 |
Ciclo de Conversión de Caja = DSO + DIO − DPO
| Convención | Razón |
|---|---|
| Azul = inputs, Negro = fórmulas | Fácil identificar supuestos vs cálculos |
| Nunca re-introducir inputs | Introducir una vez, referenciar siempre |
| No ocultar filas | Usar agrupación en su lugar |
| Modelos “ligeros” y desechables | Transparentes, fáciles de auditar |
Frameworks de 30 segundos y cheat sheet de fórmulas.
Proyectar UFCF 5–10 años → Valor terminal → Descontar todo al WACC → Suma = EV → Restar deuda neta → Equity Value → Dividir entre acciones diluidas.
PE compra empresa con deuda + equity → Flujos de caja pagan deuda 3–5 años → Venta a múltiplo de salida → Retorno = crecimiento EBITDA + expansión múltiplo + amortización deuda.
3 métodos: (1) Comparables — múltiplos de mercado, (2) Transacciones precedentes — precios pagados en M&A, (3) DCF — VP de flujos futuros. Cada uno da un rango; la superposición da la valoración defendible.
UFCF = EBIT(1−t) + D&A − CapEx ± ΔWC WACC = Kd(1−t)(D/V) + Ke(E/V) Ke (CAPM) = Rf + β(Rm − Rf) TV (Gordon) = FCF(1+g) / (WACC − g) EV = Equity + Deuda − Caja + Preferentes + MI MOIC = Equity Salida / Equity Entrada CCC = DSO + DIO − DPO
| Categoría | Preguntas Imprescindibles |
|---|---|
| Contabilidad | Walkthrough depreciación; Conexión estados; Fondo de comercio; Arrendamientos; Reconocimiento ingresos |
| EV / Equity | Fórmula puente; Por qué restar caja; Reglas emparejamiento; TSM |
| Valoración | 3 metodologías; Cuándo cada una da más/menos; Qué impulsa múltiplos; Por industria |
| DCF | Walkthrough completo; UFCF; WACC y CAPM; Valor terminal; Por qué TV es 60–80% |
| M&A | Sell-side y buy-side; Acreción/dilución; Sinergias; Acciones vs caja |
| LBO | 3 drivers de retorno; Buen candidato; Sources & Uses; IRR vs MOIC |